All benchmarks
Benchmark CRO

RF landing page conversion 2026

Median conversion 2.5%. The spread ranges from 0.6% for the main corporate sites to 12% for lead-magnet with a PDF checklist. The type of target action changes the figure by 5–10 times - a separate benchmark for each type.

Median landing page conversion RF 2026
2.5%
My working niche range, April 2026
Top 25%
5.5%
Lower-25%
1.2%

what is included in this figure

Conversion (CR, conversion rate) = (target action ÷ unique visitors) × 100. We measure the share of visitors who did what we wanted from them. More details in glossaries conversion rate.

The main thing: “Landing CR” is not one metric, but a family. Conversion into a purchase, into an application, into a call, into an email subscription, download the checklist - each has its own benchmark, and the range between them by 5–10 times. When they say “we have a CR of 7%” - no type actions are empty words. The lead-magnet PDF checklist has a CR of 9–12% the norm, for the demo-request form - 3% is already a strong result.

What not included in the total 2.5%:

  • Micro conversions. Subscribe to push, agree to cookies, opening a chat on the site. They are needed for tracking, but CR for them is 30-60% and they have nothing to do with the economy.
  • CR for the office vs CR for analytics. Cabinets (Yandex Direct, VK Ads) calculate conversions by their pixel - there inflate due to last-click attribution. According to Ya.Metrika the figure is usually 20–40% lower.
  • Conversion from paid traffic vs organic. Organic CR has 1.5–2 times higher - people were brought by search engines, they already know what they want. I consider CR exactly for the paid one traffic from UTM.

CR table by landing page types

NicheTop 25% (higher)Median CRWeak (lower)
E-com (card → cart → payment)
CR = paid order
3.0%1.7%0.6%
B2B services (consulting, agencies)
CR = request for brief
5.0%2.9%1.1%
Local services (recording, calling)
CR = call/form
8.0%4.5%1.8%
SaaS landing → trial / demo
CR = trial registration
5.5%3.0%1.1%
EdTech (sign up for a free lesson)
CR = signup for a free lesson
9.0%5.0%2.2%
Medicine (make an appointment)
CR = appointment request
6.0%3.2%1.3%
Lead-magnet (checklist, guide, calculation)
CR = download PDF / report
12.0%8.0%3.5%
Corp. site without offer (main)
CR = any target action
1.2%0.5%0.2%

Lead-magnet (9.5% median) converts the most to visitors Just enter your email to download the PDF, the barrier is minimal. On the reverse side is the main corporate site without an offer (0.6% median): came to read about the company with targeted action basically no.

Local services (4.8%) and EdTech for a free lesson (5.5%) - at the top of the distribution. There is already a person at the local I decided that I needed a service, all I had to do was choose who to call. For EdTech, a free lesson removes the “blind buy” barrier.

The most complex are B2B services (2.4%) and e-com (1.8%). In B2B form you need to enter 5-7 fields and describe the task, for e-com - go through checkout with payment and delivery. Each step drops 30–50% audience.

how it changes over time

Over three years, landing page conversions have increased on average, but not strongly:

  • 2024: median landing CR 2.1%. Many We also used pages from the 2018–2020 build years.
  • 2025: 2.3%. Massively switched to construction sets (Tilde, Webflow, no-code), loading speed has increased.
  • 2026: 2.5%. Further optimization mobile layouts (60–75% of traffic is mobile), CR on mobile is starting to catch up with the desktop.

Growth of +19% in two years is slow. Main ceiling - not a design, but an offer. Landing page with the offer “buy the course for 49,990 ₽” converts 3–5 times worse than the same landing page with an offer “free trial lesson and payment within 48 hours 30% discount." Without reworking the offer, redesigning the design gives maximum +20% to CR.

what does your result mean in the context of a benchmark?

CR is higher than good (more than 5.5% for the average landing page). Most often this is lead-magnet or free-trial - but they should convert high. If you have a normal selling landing page with CR 7%+ - congratulations, you or a narrowly targeted offer, or a strong brand, or a burning audience. This level rarely holds, check the stability at the next two weeks.

CR is around the median (2–3.5%). You're in the market. Next you look at CPL and LTV. If the LTV is high, you can live at CR 2% (CPL reaches the ceiling). If LTV is modest - CR 2% means that it needs to be raised to 4–5% so that the economy agreed. Levers - offer, title, form (2 times shorter), social proof.

CR is below bad (less than 1.2%). It's already bad here. Three typical reasons. The first is traffic past the offer: advertising promises one thing, landing about something else. The second is the long form (10+ fields) or mandatory registration before the target action. Third - mobile version is broken: 70% of traffic from phones, the target action button falls off the screen or does not work on the touch.

You can calculate your CR using CPA calculator and CPL calculator - there There is a what-if slider for conversion, you can see how the CPL changes with an increase in CR from 2% to 4%.

sources and methodology

Figures compiled from:

  • 6 of my projects 2024–2026: B2B SaaS, B2B services, e-com clothing, MedTech, EdTech, gaming.
  • Correspondence with 12 colleagues in performance, who has data on local services, fintech, FMCG.
  • Open Research Calltouch by landing page conversions in the Russian Federation for 2024–2026 and Tilda reports according to the average CR of design sites.

Method: for each landing page type 4–6 sources, median and quartiles. Anomalies (CR above 25% or below 0.2%) are rejected - Usually these are micro-conversions or broken analytics.

The numbers do not constitute financial advice. Target CR for of a specific business is determined through unit economics.

related metrics and tools

Calculators: CPA calculator, CPL calculator, ROAS calculator.

On the blog: landing page 2026, sales funnel 2026, social proof and reviews 2026. In the glossary - conversion rate, lead-magnet, CPL.

Neighboring benchmarks