Human review worksheet

Check draft claims against a source

Put the source beside each claim. Decide what it supports, what needs approval and what to ask next. I use this structure to make the evidence and the remaining decisions visible.

Map each claim to its evidence

Text stays in this tab’s memory. There is no AI check, upload, backend or autosave. Reset clears the worksheet. With analytics consent, Review sends only the fixed tool name through existing site analytics; it sends no source, claim, assessment or excerpt.

Paste the source you are reviewing. Include its title, version or date if useful. Exact excerpt checks are case-sensitive and preserve punctuation and whitespace.

3–20 claims. Source: 30,000 characters. Each claim: 1,500; excerpt: 3,000; next action: 1,000. Select the assessment yourself. An excerpt match only finds text; it does not establish that the claim follows from it.

Claim 1
Claim 2
Claim 3

What the check can establish

The tool checks whether an exact excerpt occurs in the supplied source. It does not assess truth, semantic support, copyright permission, source reliability or publication approval. A pasted excerpt may be irrelevant to a claim even when it is present.

For unsupported or open claims, name the missing document or person who can resolve them. For approval needed, ask for approval of the specific material. Keep an approval requirement separate from an actual approval record.

Download the fictional Sáng Coffee source packet and compare the three worked claims in the teaching sample. The original blog exercise remains a separate guided reading activity.

Put the result to work

Practical guides, examples, and worksheets for this task.